Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 171
RUMPH et al v. OWENS-ILLINOIS et al
as 2:2010cv06003
Plaintiff: MARGARET J RUMPH, MARGARET J RUMPH, MARION FLOYD RUMPH and others
Defendant: OWENS-ILLINOIS, OWENS-ILLINOIS, OWENS-ILLINOIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
RICKETTS et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv67999
Plaintiff: LOUIS JUNIOR RICKETTS, LOUIS JUNIOR RICKETTS, LOUIS JUNIOR RICKETTS and others
Defendant: CELOTEX CORPORATION, CELOTEX CORPORATION, EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant: MANVILLE CORP. ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, MANVILLE CORP. ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and MANVILLE CORP. ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
GREENUP et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv67997
Plaintiff: JOSEPH PHILLIP GREENUP, JOSEPH PHILLIP GREENUP, JOSEPH PHILLIP GREENUP and others
Defendant: CELOTEX CORPORATION, CELOTEX CORPORATION, EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant: MANVILLE CORP. ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, MANVILLE CORP. ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and MANVILLE CORP. ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
MOORE et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv67998
Plaintiff: RICHARD HENRY MOORE, RICHARD HENRY MOORE, RICHARD HENRY MOORE and others
Defendant: CELOTEX CORPORATION, CELOTEX CORPORATION, EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant: MANVILLE CORP. ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, MANVILLE CORP. ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and MANVILLE CORP. ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
BAKER et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv67996
Plaintiff: JAMES EDWARD BAKER, JAMES EDWARD BAKER, JAMES EDWARD BAKER and others
Defendant: CELOTEX CORPORATION, CELOTEX CORPORATION, EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant: MANVILLE CORP. ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, MANVILLE CORP. ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and MANVILLE CORP. ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
ROHMILLER et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv68000
Plaintiff: HENRY J. ROHMILLER, HENRY J. ROHMILLER, HENRY J. ROHMILLER and others
Defendant: CELOTEX CORPORATION, CELOTEX CORPORATION, EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant: MANVILLE CORP. ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, MANVILLE CORP. ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and MANVILLE CORP. ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
MONSON v. ATLAS ASBESTOS CORP. et al
as 2:2009cv66117
Plaintiff: RICHARD MONSON
Defendant: ATLAS ASBESTOS CORP., FIBERBOARD CORP., OWENS-ILLINOIS CORP. and others
ThirdParty Defendant: MANVILLE CORPORATION and MANVILLE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
KING et al v. CROWN CORK AND SEAL CO et al
as 2:2009cv64291
Plaintiff: CHARLES L KING and SANDRA M. KING
Defendant: CROWN CORK AND SEAL CO, PITTSBURGH CORNING C, UNITED STATES MINERAL PRODUCTS COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None
LEE et al v. THE CELOTEX CORP. et al
as 2:2007cv73690
Plaintiff: ROBERT K LEE, ROBERT K LEE, ALBERTINE LEE and others
Defendant: THE CELOTEX CORP., KEENE CORP, PITTSBURGH CORNING C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
TATE et al v. INC ACANDS et al
as 2:2007cv73661
Plaintiff: MAURICE TATE and BARBARA J. TATE
Defendant: INC ACANDS, CELOTEX CORPORATION, INC. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?