Cases 41 - 50 of 84
MONMOUTH PROPERTIES II, LLC v. SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv06754
Plaintiff:
MONMOUTH PROPERTIES II, LLC
Defendant:
SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072 Payment of Flood Insurance Claim
MCMENAMIN v. SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2014cv04894
Plaintiff:
JOHN MCMENAMIN
Defendant:
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053
RYLD, LLC v. SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 3:2014cv04483
Plaintiff:
RYLD, LLC
Defendant:
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY and JOHN DOES 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
RAMIREZ v. SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2014cv04096
Plaintiff:
YOEL RAMIREZ
Defendant:
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053
RAMIREZ v. SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2014cv04096
Plaintiff:
YOEL RAMIREZ
Defendant:
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053 Breach of Insurance Contract
MILMAT, INC. v. SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2014cv04018
Plaintiff:
MILMAT, INC.
Defendant:
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053
100 E. ATLANTIC BOULEVARD LLC et al v. SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2014cv03359
Plaintiff:
100 E. ATLANTIC BOULEVARD LLC and TJ'S ICE CREAM PLUS, LLC
Defendant:
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053
BETHEL AME CHURCH INC. v. SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2014cv03093
Plaintiff:
BETHEL AME CHURCH INC.
Defendant:
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053
DIZZIA v. SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2014cv03092
Plaintiff:
ELBA DIZZIA
Defendant:
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053
BETHEL AME CHURCH INC. v. SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2014cv03095
Plaintiff:
BETHEL AME CHURCH INC.
Defendant:
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
