Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Jurek v. Decker et al
as 1:2018cv09285
Petitioner:
Erik Jurek
Respondent:
Attorney General Jefferson B. Sessions, Thomas R. Decker and Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Diop v. Sessions et al
as 1:2018cv08245
Petitioner:
Seydou Diop
Respondent:
Assistant Director Scott Mechkowski, Attorney General Jefferson Sessions, Director Thomas Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv08018
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Smith v. Decker et al
as 1:2018cv08005
Petitioner:
Keisha Patuka Smith
Respondent:
Thomas R. Decker, Secretary of the U.S Kirstjen Nielsen, Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv07715
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Mejia Lara v. Decker et al
as 1:2018cv07605
Respondent:
Field OfficeDirector Thomas Decker, Director Carl DuBois, Assistant Director Diane McConnell and others
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Mejia Lara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv07387
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 (a) Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv07248
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04284
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06489
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
