Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Thompson v. CMS et al
as 1:2010cv00233
Plaintiff:
William Thompson
Defendant:
CMS and Medical at IMSI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoak v. Idaho Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv00138
Plaintiff:
Larry M Hoak
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections, Johanna Smith, Idaho Correction Center of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. IMSI Medical et al
as 1:2010cv00033
Plaintiff:
William Thompson
Defendant:
IMSI Medical and CMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv00020
Plaintiff:
William Thompson
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and CMS Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Idaho Department of Corrections
as 1:2010cv00010
Plaintiff:
William Thompson
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2009cv00637
Plaintiff:
William Thompson
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolf et al v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2009cv00632
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf, Jimmy T. Glass, Patrick K. Knight and others
Defendant:
State of Idaho, State Board of Corrections, Robin Sandy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Astrue
as 1:2009cv00474
Petitioner:
Aaron J Thompson
Respondent:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. Valdez et al
as 1:2009cv00455
Plaintiff:
Monty Williams
Defendant:
Phillip Valdez, Daniel Prado, Shane Jepsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Valdez et al
as 1:2009cv00452
Plaintiff:
Bob Jones
Defendant:
Phillip Valdez, Daniel Prado, Shane Jepsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
