Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 41 - 50 of 77
ALLAH v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS DIRECTOR et al
as 1:2016cv00408
Petitioner: RATEEK ALLAH
Defendant: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS DIRECTOR and WARDEN OF ESTILL F.C.I.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WHOIE v. WARDEN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01354
Petitioner: ROBERT WHOIE
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KILGORE v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2015cv00942
Petitioner: CLEVELAND WINSTON KILGORE
Respondent: LORETTA LYNCH and WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
NEWSOME v. WARDEN BEACH et al
as 1:2014mc01331
Petitioner: EDWARD ROY NEWSOME
Respondent: WARDEN BEACH, DAVIS, CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
EVANS v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2014cv01818
Petitioner: WILLIAMS H. EVANS
Respondent: UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE and WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ALEXANDER v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2014cv00291
Petitioner: ROBERT ALEXANDER
Respondent: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GORBEY v. WARDEN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv02019
Petitioner: MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Respondent: WARDEN and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DUPREE v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2013cv01926
Plaintiff: BRIAN ALDRICH DUPREE
Defendant: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, DIRECTOR, GENERAL COUNSEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORRISON v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01643
Petitioner: JOHNNIE MORRISON
Respondent: U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and D.C. JAIL WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ALANIS v. WARDEN COPENHAVEN
as 1:2013cv01646
Petitioner: MARTIN SANCHEZ ALANIS
Respondent: WARDEN COPENHAVEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?