Cases 41 - 50 of 6,768
BRIETZKE et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv68736
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ACANDS, INC., ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
INSELL et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv55897
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HALTERMAN et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv55845
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
AMADOR et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv58686
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E BARTEL and DAVID C PEEBLES
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GUITSON et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59263
Plaintiff:
FRANK E. GUITSON , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HUGGINS v. A.H. BULL AND CO.
as 5:2011cv54183
Plaintiff:
WILLARD C. HUGGINS
Defendant:
A.H. BULL AND CO.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
VALENTIN et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56834
Plaintiff:
PEDRO VALENTIN , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GOMEZ et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59227
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GREEN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59380
Plaintiff:
WILLARD H. GREEN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
JOHNSON et al v. FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv57553
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C PEEBLES
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
