Cases 41 - 50 of 102
Vibes International Inc., SAL v. Iconix Brand Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv11449
Plaintiff:
Vibes International Inc., SAL
Defendant:
Iconix Brand Group, Inc., XYZ Corp. 1-10 and IP Holdings Unltd., LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 oc
Fanelli et al v. Latman et al
as 1:2018cv05570
Defendant:
CRMSuite Corporation, iMagicLab LLC, Richard K. Latman and others
Plaintiff:
Jodie Fanelli, The Dating Council, LLC and Fanelli Family Rockland L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Lee v. Circle NYC Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv04854
Defendant:
Robert Kwak, Circle NYC Inc., Joseph Ko and others
Plaintiff:
DONG HA LEE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02463
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv07213
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jenkins v. Yellowstone Properties, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv07764
Plaintiff:
Kavon Jenkins
Defendant:
Yellowstone Properties, Inc., Orlando Franco, John and Jane Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv06822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
