Cases 41 - 50 of 2,236
Gu v. Chen et al
as 1:2024cv05209
Defendant:
Chat Mui Chan, RE/MAX Real Estate Professionals, Hang Chen and others
Plaintiff:
Feifei Gu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yang et al v. Fei et al
as 1:2024cv05055
Defendant:
YUEZHU DU, YURONG HU, YU CHEN and others
Plaintiff:
XIN YANG and TING CHEN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04648
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04499
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Chen v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv04810
Defendant:
Tracy Renaud, Alejandro Mayorkas and Ur M. Jaddou
Plaintiff:
Qinmei Chen
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04479
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mazariegos v. Kang Lu USA Corp. et al
as 2:2024cv04359
Defendant:
Kang Lu USA Corp., Fang Chan, Kang Yue USA Corp. doing business as Moca Asian Bistro and others
Plaintiff:
Sergio Christopher Galicia Mazariegos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
