Other Contract Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 829
Tru Mobility v. Briggs Auto Group
as 23-3089
Plaintiff / Appellant: TRU MOBILITY, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: BRIGGS AUTO GROUP, INC.
Stone, et al v. Vail Resorts Development Company, et al
as 23-1147
Plaintiff / Appellant: NELSON STONE and STONE FAMILY, LLC
Defendant / Appellee: VAIL RESORTS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY and ARRABELLE AT VAIL SQUARE, LLC
Brody v. Bruner
as 23-1102
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID E. BRODY
Defendant / Appellee: MARK E. BRUNER, as trustee of the Bruner Family Trust and THE BRUNER FAMILY TRUST
Accelerated v. LMI II
as 23-6062
Plaintiff / Appellant: ACCELERATED, LLC
Defendant / Appellee: LMI II, LLC
Fuel Automation v. Energera
as 23-1123
Plaintiff / Appellee: FUEL AUTOMATION STATION, LLC
Defendant / Appellant: ENERGERA INC and ENERGERA INC.
Tungsten Parts Wyoming v. Omanoff, et al
as 23-8018
Plaintiff / Appellant: TUNGSTEN PARTS WYOMING, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: DENNIS OMANOFF, GEORGE PAZOS, GLOBAL TUNGSTEN AND POWDERS CORP. and others
Five Points Management Group v. Campaign, et al
as 23-1125
Plaintiff / Appellant: FIVE POINTS MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: CAMPAIGN, INC., a Delaware corporation and BRADLEY SEWELL, an individual
Garnishee: HARTMAN ART STUDIOS, LLC
White & Weddle v. Shatar Holdings, et al
as 23-6032
Plaintiff / Appellant: 1005, LLC, AMF DEVELOPMENT, LLC, AMIR FARZANEH and others
Defendant / Appellee: SHATAR HOLDINGS, LLC, SHATAR CAPITAL, INC., EZRI NAMVAR and others
Chesapeake Operating v. C.C. Forbes
as 23-6052
Plaintiff / Appellee: CHESAPEAKE OPERATING, LLC
Defendant / Appellant: C.C. FORBES, LLC
Unitednet, et al v. Tata Communications America, et al
as 23-2057
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITEDNET LTD. and LEVI RUSSELL
Defendant / Appellee: TATA COMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, INC., TATA COMMUNICATIONS INDIA, TATA SONS PRIVATE, LTD. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?