Cases 41 - 50 of 31,148
Cicero et al v. Target Stores, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
Peter Cicero and Jacqueline Cicero
Defendant:
Target Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Thompson v. Leverton et al
as 1:2024cv00542
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Thompson
Defendant:
Jamie Leverton, Shenif Visram, Joseph Flinn and others
Disguise Systems Limited et al v. One Stop Systems, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
Disguise Systems Limited, Disguise Technologies Limited and Does 1-50
Defendant:
One Stop Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Galea v. Luciano et al
as 1:2024cv00534
Plaintiff:
Joseph Galea
Defendant:
Juan R. Luciano, Michael S. Burke, Theodore Colbert, III and others
In re: Allstate Insurance Company
as 1:2024mc00225
Petitioner:
Joseph Bond and Tonia Jewell-Vines
Respondent:
Allstate Insurance Company
In re: Telcast Networks, LLC
as 1:2024mc00226
Petitioner:
Joseph Bond and Tonia Jewell-Vines
Respondent:
Telcast Networks, LLC
Garrett v. Otu et al
as 1:2024cv00532
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Rockie S. Otu and Amtrak
Plaintiff:
Keith J. Garrett, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
MLR Atlanta, LLC v. Global Rugby Ventures, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
MLR Atlanta, LLC
Defendant:
Global Rugby Ventures, LLC and Rugby Football Club LA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Muhammad v. Mason
as 1:2024cv00529
Petitioner:
Walid Abdullah Muhammad, King Walid Abdullah Muhammad and Waliyd Muhammad
Respondent:
Bernadette Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Broomer, Sr. v. Emig et al
as 1:2024cv00311
Petitioner:
Donald Broomer, Sr.
Respondent:
Brian Emig and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
