Cases 41 - 50 of 84,678
United States of America v. Razer Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00907
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Razer, Inc., Razer (Asia-Pacific) Pte., Ltd., Razer USA, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Darren MacDonald v. Ybarra Professional Builders
as 5:2024cv00891
Plaintiff:
Darren MacDonald
Defendant:
Ybarra Professional Builders
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Mark P. Oster v. Meta Platforms Inc/Facebook
as 8:2024cv00875
Plaintiff:
Mark P. Oster
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc/Facebook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Feng Gao v. The Partnerships and Incorporated Associations Identifed on Schedule A
as 2:2024cv03418
Plaintiff:
Feng Gao
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Incorporated Associations Identifed on Schedule A
Board of Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Health and Welfare Trust et al v. Streamline Integration
as 2:2024cv03421
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Health and Welfare Trust, Board of Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Joint Pension Trust, Board of Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Vacation Trust and others
Defendant:
Streamline Integration
Matthew E. Orso v. Todd Disner et al
as 2:2024cv03403
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Orso in his capacity as court-appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group LLC doing business as ZeekRewards.com
Petitioner:
Nationwide Judgment Recovery Inc
Defendant:
Todd Disner, Trudy Gilmond, Trudy Gilmond, LLC and others
In Re: Biologic therapies, Inc.
as 2:2024mc00059
Debtor:
Bilogic Therapies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gordon P. Jones
Defendant:
Luke Whalen
Adrian Tay v. Upstart Network, Inc.
as 2:2024cv03372
Plaintiff:
Adrian Tay
Defendant:
Upstart Network, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
