Cases 41 - 50 of 76
Mackin v. Phelps
as 3:2011cv00311
Plaintiff:
Robert Mackin
Defendant:
Michael Phelps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mimms v. A&E Television Networks, LLC
as 3:2011cv00142
Plaintiff:
Tyson Mimms
Defendant:
A&E Television Networks, LLC and ITV Studios, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lewis v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 5:2010cv00218
Plaintiff:
Teresa Lewis
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and Lonzetta Cleveland
Counter_claimant:
Lonzetta Cleveland
Counter_defendant:
Teresa Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Kentucky State Police et al
as 3:2010cv00038
Plaintiff:
Kim Johnson
Defendant:
Kentucky State Police, John Adams, Gregory D. Baird and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Quatkemeyer v. Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure et al
as 3:2009cv00746
Plaintiff:
Bradford A. Quatkemeyer, M.D. and Bradford A. Quatkemeyer, M.D.
Defendant:
Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure, Susan Marie Berberich, M.D., William Briscoe, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Salyer v. The Southern Poverty Law Center, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00044
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Salyer
Defendant:
The Southern Poverty Law Center, Inc., The Southern Poverty Law Center, Inc., The Southern Poverty Law Center, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Lewis v. Bluegrass Marine, LLC
as 5:2008cv00170
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Lewis, Jr.
Defendant:
Bluegrass Marine, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dismore v. Walgreen Company
as 5:2008cv00149
Plaintiff:
Samantha Dismore
Defendant:
Walgreen Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Vander Boegh v. Frost
as 5:2008cv00150
Plaintiff:
Gary Vander Boegh
Defendant:
E. Douglas Frost
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Roberts v. General Information Services
as 3:2008cv00442
Plaintiff:
Michael Roberts
Defendant:
General Information Services and General Information Services
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
