Cases 51 - 60 of 276,995
Lettieri v. T-Mobile US, Inc., et al.
as 24-3088
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARMINE LETTIERI
Defendant:
T-MOBILE US, INC., SUSAN JOHNSON, PAUL E. BUNANNO and others
Siguenza-Larin v. Garland
as 24-3067
Petitioner:
JUAN CARLOS SIGUENZA-LARIN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Peel
as 24-3062
Defendant:
DONALD J. PEEL, Steven Wrede, Donald Billson and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Chaarawi v. Gonzalez, et al.
as 24-3073
Defendant:
SHARMIR GONZALEZ, Shamir Gonzalez, MARCUS ENSIEDJIAN and others
Plaintiff:
WALID M. CHAARAWI
Rosales-Escareno v. Garland
as 24-3054
Petitioner:
ADOLFO ROSALES-ESCARENO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Woodhouse v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-3070
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE, A resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands, Havensight Capital L.L.C., A U.S. Virgin Islands corporation
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STANLEY BLUMENFELD, JR., DISTRICT JUDGE, Acting as a Government Official, a California citizen, R. GARY KLAUSNER, DISTRICT JUDGE and others
Lawless v. United States of America
as 24-3075
Plaintiff:
RICHARD R. LAWLESS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
McLean v. Gutierrez, et al.
as 24-3086
Plaintiff:
LENROY MCLEAN
Defendant:
PHILLIP GUTIERREZ, Warden, in his individual and official capacity, FNU HERNANDEZ, Office Staff, in his/her individual capacity, FNU JENKINS, Unit Manager, in his/her individual and official capacity and others
Nationwide Legal, LLC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 24-3059
Plaintiff:
NATIONWIDE LEGAL, LLC
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., a Nationally Chartered Bank
Pena, et al. v. International Medical Devices, Inc., et al.
as 24-3061
Plaintiff:
EDWARD PENA and BRANDON MILLER, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL DEVICES, INC., MENOVA INTERNATIONAL, INC., GESIVA MEDICAL, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
