Cases 51 - 60 of 343
Giles v. Neal et al
as 1:2017cv00492
Plaintiff:
Wardell Leroy Giles
Defendant:
Kirk Neal, John Doe and Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warnick v. Pierce et al
as 1:2017cv00471
Petitioner:
Darryl Warnick
Respondent:
Pierce and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Henry v. Pierce, et al
as 1:2017cv00472
Petitioner:
Aaron L. Henry
Respondent:
David Pierce and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Henry v. Pierce et al
as 1:2017cv00436
Plaintiff:
Aaron L. Henry
Defendant:
David Pierce, Marc Richmond, Robert Coupe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flonnory v. Pierce et al
as 1:2017cv00434
Petitioner:
Freddy L. Flonnory
Respondent:
David Pierce and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crumpler III v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00418
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Crumpler III
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, James T. Vaugh Correctional Center, David Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colon v. Phelps et al
as 1:2017cv00368
Plaintiff:
Jose Ortez Colon, Jr.
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, David Pierce, Phil Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Pierce et al
as 1:2017cv00326
Petitioner:
Luis Rivera
Respondent:
David Pierce and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Huffman v. James T Vaughn Correctional Center et al
as 1:2017cv00314
Petitioner:
Fred Huffman
Respondent:
James T Vaughn Correctional Center, David Pierce and Attorney General for State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crumpler III v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00310
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Crumpler III
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, James T. Vaughn Correctional Center, David Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
