Cases 51 - 60 of 67
SULLIVAN v. ABBVIE INC. et al
as 2:2014cv05778
Plaintiff:
JAMES SULLIVAN
Defendant:
ABBVIE INC. and ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TRUE v. ABBVIE INC. et al
as 2:2014cv05187
Plaintiff:
WALTER L. TRUE
Defendant:
ABBVIE INC. and ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. AbbVie et al
as 4:2014cv01587
Plaintiff:
Thomas Davis and Patricia Davis
Defendant:
AbbVie and Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROSEBERRY v. ABBVIE INC. et al
as 2:2014cv04080
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROSEBERRY
Defendant:
ABBVIE INC., ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC. and AUXILIUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WEBB et al v. ABBVIE INC. et al
as 2:2014cv02554
Plaintiff:
BELVA D. WEBB and FAITH WEBB
Defendant:
ABBVIE INC. and ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOLLY v. ABBVIE INC. et al
as 2:2014cv02555
Plaintiff:
JOE BOB JOLLY
Defendant:
ABBVIE INC. and ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OXSHEER et al v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv02391
Plaintiff:
GEORGE ROBERT OXSHEER, JR. and VIRGINIA LEE OXSHEER
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC., ABBVIE INC., AUXILIUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AMERSON et al v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv02206
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN LEWIS AMERSON, JR. and RHONDA AMERSON
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC., ABBVIE INC., AUXILIUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUSTED v. ABBVIE, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv02111
Plaintiff:
RONALD W. HUSTED, SR.
Defendant:
ABBVIE, INC. and ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS et al v. ABBVIE, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv02113
Plaintiff:
MARK S. HARRIS and ELAINE HARRIS
Defendant:
ABBVIE, INC. and ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
