Cases 51 - 60 of 5,049
NASH v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv86249
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM T. NASH
Defendant:
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, HOPEMAN BROTHERS, INC., ABB AUTOMATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
TANNER v. ABNEY MILLS et al
as 2:2008cv86184
Plaintiff:
WADE TANNER
Defendant:
ABNEY MILLS, A.W. CHESTERTON, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS STORE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BRADY v. ABNEY MILLS et al
as 2:2008cv86142
Plaintiff:
JACKIE BRADY
Defendant:
ABNEY MILLS, A.W. CHESTERTON, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS STORE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HILL v. ABNEY MILLS et al
as 2:2008cv86156
Plaintiff:
STEVE HILL
Defendant:
ABNEY MILLS, A.W. CHESTERTON, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS STORE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BLACKWELL v. ABNEY MILLS et al
as 2:2008cv86140
Plaintiff:
WILLIE C. BLACKWELL
Defendant:
ABNEY MILLS, A.W. CHESTERTON, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS STORE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
GONZALEZ v. ABNEY MILLS et al
as 2:2008cv86153
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GONZALEZ
Defendant:
ABNEY MILLS, A.W. CHESTERTON, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS STORE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ALBRIGHT v. ABNEY MILLS et al
as 2:2008cv86136
Plaintiff:
JAMES ALBRIGHT
Defendant:
ABNEY MILLS, A.W. CHESTERTON, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS STORE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
COOK v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv86207
Plaintiff:
GILBERT COOK
Defendant:
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, HOPEMAN BROTHERS, INC., ABB AUTOMATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BEAZLEY v. ABNEY MILLS et al
as 2:2008cv86133
Plaintiff:
GENE BEAZLEY
Defendant:
ABNEY MILLS, A.W. CHESTERTON, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS STORE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
LAMOTTE v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv86234
Plaintiff:
MARY JANICE LAMOTTE
Defendant:
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, HOPEMAN BROTHERS, INC., ABB AUTOMATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
