Cases 51 - 60 of 88
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02481
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY v. VICK et al
as 3:2011cv00101
Plaintiff:
BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY
Defendant:
RANDALL E VICK and BRENDA B JUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY v. SCHORR et al
as 4:2011cv00085
Plaintiff:
BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY
Defendant:
SPENCER G SCHORR, MIDSOUTH RENTALS LLC and CHEROKEE DEVELOPERS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Branch Banking & Trust Company v. Garrett
as 1:2011cv02070
Plaintiff:
Branch Banking & Trust Company
Defendant:
Crystal Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wakes et al v. Branch Banking & Trust Company
as 1:2011cv01889
Plaintiff:
Stacia Wakes and Antonia Rosas
Defendant:
Branch Banking & Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Montoya v. Branch Banking & Trust Company et al
as 1:2011cv01869
Plaintiff:
Diana Montoya
Defendant:
Branch Banking & Trust Company and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Branch Banking & Trust Company v. Ridenour, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv01727
Plaintiff:
Branch Banking & Trust Company
Defendant:
Ridenour, LLC, The Macauley Companies, Inc. and Roger B. Leithead, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marshall v. Branch Banking & Trust Company
as 1:2011cv01696
Plaintiff:
Charlea Grace Marshall
Defendant:
Branch Banking & Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Charanpal, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01538
Plaintiff:
Charanpal, Inc. and Shri Dasmesh, Inc.
Defendant:
Branch Banking & Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Branch Banking & Trust Company v. Temp Properties, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv01487
Plaintiff:
Branch Banking & Trust Company
Defendant:
Temp Properties, LLC and Newell Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
