Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 77
USA v. Volvo Powertrain Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-5234
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America
Defendant - Appellant: Volvo Powertrain Corporation
Intervenor - Appellee: California Air Resources Board
Rocky Mountain Farmers Union, et al v. James Goldstene, et al
as 12-15135
Plaintiff - Appellee: ROCKY MOUNTAIN FARMERS UNION, REDWOOD COUNTY MINNESOTA CORN AND SOYBEAN GROWERS, PENNY NEWMAN GRAIN, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellant: JAMES N. GOLDSTENE, in his officlal capacity as Executive Officer of the California Air Resources Board, MARY D. NICHOLS, DANIEL SPERLING and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant: ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., SIERRA CLUB and others
Rocky Mountain Farmers Union, et al v. James Goldstene, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-15131
Plaintiff - Appellee: ROCKY MOUNTAIN FARMERS UNION, REDWOOD COUNTY MINNESOTA CORN AND SOYBEAN GROWERS, PENNY NEWMAN GRAIN, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellant: JAMES N. GOLDSTENE, in his officlal capacity as Executive Officer of the California Air Resources Board, MARY D. NICHOLS, DANIEL SPERLING and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant: ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., SIERRA CLUB and others
United States of America v. MotorScience Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv08023
Movant: California Air Resources Board
Defendant: MotorScience Enterprise Inc, MotorScience Inc and Chi Zheng
Plaintiff: United States of America
Northern California Rail and Port Truckers Association and Ajpop Cesilio et al v. State of California We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv06092
Plaintiff: Northern California Rail and Port Truckers Association and Ajpop Cesilio, Bhambra Lakhbir and Irvinder S Dhanda
Defendant: State of California, Governor of the State of California and California Air Resources Board, Port of Oakland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pacific Merchant Shipping Asso v. James Goldstene, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-17765
Plaintiff - Appellant: PACIFIC MERCHANT SHIPPING ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Appellee: JAMES GOLDSTENE, in his official capacity as Executive Officer of the California Air Resources Board
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., COALITION FOR CLEAN AIR, INC. and SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
Pacific Merchant Shipping Assc v. James Goldstene, et al
as 09-80145
Plaintiff - Petitioner: PACIFIC MERCHANT SHIPPING ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Respondent: JAMES GOLDSTENE, in his official capacity as Executive Officer of the California Air Resources Board
Defendant-intervenor - Respondent: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., COALITION FOR CLEAN AIR, INC. and SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
Jensen Family Farms, Inc. v. Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollu, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-16790
Plaintiff - Appellant: JENSEN FAMILY FARMS, INC., a California corporation
Defendant - Appellee: MONTEREY BAY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee: CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD
Navistar, Inc. v. EPA
as 09-1114
Petitioner: Navistar, Inc.
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae For Respondent: Cummins Inc., Daimler Trucks North America LLC, Detroit Diesel Corporation and others
Movant-Intervenor: Volvo Group North America, Inc. and Mack Trucks, Inc.
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Respondent: State California ex rel. California Air Resources Board
Navistar, Inc. v. EPA
as 09-1113
Petitioner: Navistar, Inc.
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae For Respondent: Cummins Inc., Daimler Trucks North America LLC, Detroit Diesel Corporation and others
Movant-Intervenor: Volvo Group North America, Inc. and Mack Trucks, Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?