Cases 51 - 60 of 359
Brown v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv00343
Plaintiff:
Alva Jean Brown
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Hazel v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv00344
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
David Lee Hazel
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Griffin v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv01370
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Alvin J Griffin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
David Kocher vs Carolyn W. Colvin
as 3:2016cv00340
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
David Kocher
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Bronson v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv00319
Plaintiff:
Ellen M. Bronson
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Scarlett v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv00320
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Scarlett
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Smith v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv01284
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Suzanne G. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Gozum v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv01248
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Jericho Gozum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Roberts v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv01232
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Beverly Marie Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Bussell v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv01181
Plaintiff:
D'Artangnon W. Bussell
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
