Cases 51 - 60 of 61
Garner v. Saul
as 4:2019cv03901
Plaintiff:
Sheila Fae Garner
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Neroes v. Saul
as 3:2019cv02277
Plaintiff:
Lora Lee Neroes
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Flynn v. Saul
as 4:2019cv03523
Plaintiff:
Darlene M. Flynn
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Huizenga v. Saul
as 3:2019cv02209
Plaintiff:
Maxine Latrice Huizenga
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Temple v. Saul
as 4:2019cv03320
Plaintiff:
Norma Jane Temple
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rosenbalm v. Saul
as 3:2019cv02038
Plaintiff:
Gina Suzanne Rosenbalm
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Green v. Saul
as 4:2019cv02444
Plaintiff:
Donald Lywn Green
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Miller v. Saul
as 6:2019cv00047
Plaintiff:
Glenda Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Price v. Saul
as 2:2019cv00138
Plaintiff:
Sharon Gay Price
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sisco v. Saul
as 2:2019cv00185
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Troy W. Sisco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
