Cases 51 - 60 of 112
ALM v. A.P.I., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66581
Plaintiff:
MAURITZ ALM
Defendant:
A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
A.H. BENNETT COMPANY and S.O.S. PRODUCTS
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE and MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
THOMPSON v. A.P.I., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66573
Plaintiff:
GENE THOMPSON
Defendant:
A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
A.H. BENNETT COMPANY and S.O.S. PRODUCTS
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE and MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
VOELLER v. A.P.I., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66575
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL VOELLER
Defendant:
A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HEMPEL v. A.P.I., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66688
Plaintiff:
PAUL HEMPEL
Defendant:
A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTIRES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTIRES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
S.O.S. PRODUCTS
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE and MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HUELSMAN v. A.P.I., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66602
Plaintiff:
ALLEN HUELSMAN
Defendant:
A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
A.H. BENNETT COMPANY
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE and MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BAILLY et al v. A.P.I, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66692
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSE BAILLY and RICHARD RAMSETT
Defendant:
A.P.I, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
A.H. BENNETT COMPANY, MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE and MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
NYSTROM v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66700
Plaintiff:
ANITA NYSTROM
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., ACANDS, INC., ACANDS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LOEB v. A.P.I., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66561
Plaintiff:
TEANUS LOEB
Defendant:
A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
A.H. BENNETT COMPANY and S.O.S. PRODUCTS
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE and MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LUCIER v. A.P.I., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66607
Plaintiff:
RONALD LUCIER
Defendant:
A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
A.H. BENNETT COMPANY and S.O.S. PRODUCTS
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE and MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WENDT v. A.P.I., INC.
as 2:1999cv66694
Plaintiff:
FRED WENDT
Defendant:
A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
A.H. BENNETT COMPANY and S.O.S. PRODUCTS
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE and MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
