Cases 51 - 60 of 205
Wiggins v. Dollar General Corporation et al
as 8:2020cv02216
Defendant:
DolgenCorp, LLC and Dollar General Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Wiggins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
McCauley et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 9:2020cv81711
Defendant:
Chattem, Inc., Rite Aid Corporation, McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Janet C. McCauley and James McCauley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cantrelle v. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTCALS, INC. et al
as 9:2020cv81692
Defendant:
PAI Holdings, LLC, United Health Care Inc.,, McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Tate Cantrelle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holder v. DolgenCorp, LLC
as 8:2020cv01980
Plaintiff:
Andrew Holder
Defendant:
DolgenCorp, LLC doing business as Dollar General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Johnson v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 9:2020cv81685
Defendant:
Heritage Pharmaceuticals, Inc., United Health Care Inc.,, McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Norma Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Levy v. Dolgencorp, LLC, et al
as 3:2020cv01037
Plaintiff:
David Levy
Defendant:
DOLGENCORP, LLC, DG Retail, LLC and Dollar General Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peacher v. Dollar Genreal Corporation
as 3:2020cv00757
Plaintiff:
Sheila Peacher
Defendant:
Dollar General Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv61050
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. Dolgencorp, LLC
as 8:2020cv01122
Plaintiff:
Otis Robinson
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, LLC d/b/a Dollar General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Omans v. Dolgencorp, LLC d/b/a Dollar General
as 3:2020cv00286
Plaintiff:
Constance Omans
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, LLC d/b/a Dollar General and DolgenCorp, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
