Cases 51 - 60 of 285
Pinson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv00185
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and FNU LNU
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rees v. Clovis Police Department et al
as 2:2021cv00029
Defendant:
Jordan Riddle, Clovis Police Department, Adam Greene and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Gene Rees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hart v. Lytle et al
as 1:2021cv00017
Petitioner:
Myrtis Paulo Hart
Respondent:
FNU LNU and Joe Lytle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reyes v. Gallegos et al
as 2:2020cv01211
Defendant:
Wesley Waller, Lance Pile, FNU LNU and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew M Reyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hart v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 1:2020cv01141
Defendant:
Curry County Adult Detention Center, Central New Mexico Correctional Facility, FNU LNU and others
Plaintiff:
Myrtis Paulo Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Eddy County Seat et al
as 2:2020cv01072
Defendant:
FNU Masingale, Barbra LNU, FNU LNU and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniel v. GEICO General Insurance Company et al.
as 1:2020cv01071
Defendant:
FNU LNU and GEICO General Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Kelley M. McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Almeida v. San Juan County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2020cv00916
Plaintiff:
Rafael Jesus Almeida
Defendant:
San Juan County Adult Detention Center, FNU Havel, FNU LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. LNU
as 1:2020cv00827
Respondent:
FNU LNU
Petitioner:
Stephen Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gonzales v. The New Mexico Corrections Department et al.
as 1:2020cv00762
Defendant:
New Mexico Corrections Department, John/Jane Does, The New Mexico Corrections Department and others
Plaintiff:
Nickolas James Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
