Cases 51 - 60 of 80
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. J.D. D'AGOSTINI, D.C. D/B/A ALLIED HEALTH CENTER, et al
as 2:2017cv06620
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. , GEICO INDEMNITY CO. , GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
J.D. D'AGOSTINI, D.C. D/B/A ALLIED HEALTH CENTER, BOUND BROOK FAMILY CHIROPRACTIC CENTER, JOSEPH D. D'AGOSTINI, D.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. INSTERSTATE MULTI-SPECIALTY MEDICAL GROUP, P.C. et al
as 2:2017cv05725
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. , GEICO INDEMNITY CO. , GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
INSTERSTATE MULTI-SPECIALTY MEDICAL GROUP, P.C., HIGHLAND MEDICAL GROUP, P.C., ALEXANDR ZAITSEV and others
Cross_claimant:
ANTONIO CICCONE
Cross_defendant:
ANTONIO CICCONE , MARCIA COPELAND, M.D., EUGENE GORMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. BOULEVARD MEDICAL OFFICE, P.C. et al
as 2:2017cv04037
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. , GEICO INDEMNITY, CO. , GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
BOULEVARD MEDICAL OFFICE, P.C., ALAN F. ASTALOS, D.C. and STEPHEN H. HUISH, D.O.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. FASS et al
as 3:2017cv02466
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. , GEICO INDEMNITY CO. , GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
BARRY FASS, M.D. , DAVID SMITH, M.D. , STEPHAN KOSMORSKY, D.O. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. PELMAN et al
as 3:2017cv02199
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. , GEICO INDEMNITY CO. , GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
ROBERT NEIL PELMAN, M.D., UCHE O. ENEANYA, M.D., TEENA P. VARGHESE, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. REGIONAL ORTHOPEDIC PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2017cv01615
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. , GEICO INDEMNITY CO. , GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
REGIONAL ORTHOPEDIC PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION , SOUTH JERSEY SURGICAL CENTER, L.L.C. , BARRY S. GLEIMER, D.O. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. YAZGI et al
as 2:2017cv01170
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. , GEICO INDEMNITY CO. , GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
NABIL YAZGI, M.D., NABIL M. YAZGI, M.D., P.A., LEXINGTON PAIN AND REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. HAMILTON HEALTHCARE P.C. et al
as 3:2017cv00674
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. , GEICO INDEMNITY CO. , GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
HAMILTON HEALTHCARE P.C., BARRY FASS, M.D., DAVID E. SMITH, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. PORETSKAYA et al
as 2:2016cv08448
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. , GEICO INDEMNITY CO. , GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
LYUDMILA PORETSKAYA, NEW JERSEY PAIN MANAGEMENT & REHAB, P.A., PL PMR MEDICAL, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. ACUTE MEDICAL, P.C. et al
as 2:2016cv08030
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. , GEICO INDEMNITY CO. , GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
ACUTE MEDICAL, P.C. , SIMON X LEE, M.D. , RANDOLPH ROSARION, M.D. and others
Counter_claimant:
ELIZABETH AVENUE CHIROPRACTIC CENTER, P.C. "1" , SIMON X LEE, M.D. , MORA CHIROPRACTIC CENTER, P.C. and others
Counter_defendant:
GEICO CASUALTY CO. , GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY , GEICO INDEMNITY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
