Cases 51 - 60 of 3,107
ADAMS, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86523
Plaintiff:
CHARLES KENNETH ADAMS
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
RILEY, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86587
Plaintiff:
JAMES FULTON RILEY
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
REED v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86070
Plaintiff:
KENNETH R. REED
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BEENE v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86077
Plaintiff:
DAVID RANDALL
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ADAMS v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86124
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY ADAMS
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BROWN, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86538
Plaintiff:
ELBERT LEE BROWN
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
TOWNSEND v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86028
Plaintiff:
THOMAS TOWNSEND
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
LEAVITT v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86056
Plaintiff:
DUDLEY H. LEAVITT, SR.
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CLAY v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86126
Plaintiff:
SANDRA C. CLAY
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DEROBERTS, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86557
Plaintiff:
SAM JAMES DEROBERTS
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
