Cases 51 - 60 of 235
Gupta v. Head Strong, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv06652
Plaintiff:
Arvind Gupta
Defendant:
Headstrong, Inc. and Hilda L. Solis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Solis v. API Restaurant Corp. et al
as 1:2012cv06589
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis
Defendant:
API Restaurant Corp., Giovanni Apicella and Antonio Spiridigliozzi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Solis v. Pio Restaurant, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv06591
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis
Defendant:
Pio Restaurant, LLC, Giovanni Apicella and Antonio Spiridigliozzi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Solis v. SETA Restaurant Corp. et al
as 1:2012cv06590
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis
Defendant:
SETA Restaurant Corp., Giovanni Apicella and Antonio Spiridigliozzi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Solis v. Cella Fine Foods, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv06592
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis
Defendant:
Cella Fine Foods, Inc., Giovanni Apicella and Antonio Spiridigliozzi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Solis v. Sigma Diner Corp. et al
as 2:2012cv04299
Defendant:
Stephen Serafis and Sigma Diner Corp.
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Solis v. Sage Bistro Moderne Woodbury Corp. et al
as 2:2012cv04071
Defendant:
Peter Onur Oktas, Sage Bistro Moderne Woodbury Corp., Julio C. Velasquez and others
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Solis v. Sage Bistro Food Corp. et al
as 2:2012cv04072
Defendant:
Andrew Leogrande, Peter Onur Oktas, Sage Bistro Food Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Solis v. Champagne Demolition, LLC
as 1:2012cv01278
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis
Defendant:
Champagne Demolition, LLC and Joseph A. Champagne
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
Solis v. Glengariff Corp. et al
as 2:2012cv03895
Defendant:
Sanjay Ahuja, Veena Ahuja and Glengariff Corp.
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
