Cases 51 - 60 of 773
Shulruff Dental, Inc. v. Advanced Health Communications, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2022cv06711
Plaintiff:
Shulruff Dental, Inc.
Defendant:
Advanced Health Communications, L.L.C. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Annamalai v. Sproul et al
as 3:2022cv02579
Plaintiff:
Annamalai Annamalai and Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Defendant:
Daniel Sproul, Nathan Simpkins, Annabell Fields and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Annamalai v. Simpkins et al
as 3:2022cv02576
Plaintiff:
Annamalai Annamalai and Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Defendant:
Nathan Simpkins, Gary Burgess, Daniel Sproul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Annamalai v. Fields et al
as 3:2022cv02577
Plaintiff:
Annamalai Annamalai and Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Defendant:
Annabell Fields, Randall Pass, Leslie Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gerber v. Institutional Pharmacy Solutions, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv06102
Plaintiff:
Dr. Robert Gerber
Defendant:
Institutional Pharmacy Solutions, LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Bunzl Retail Services, LLC v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services LLC et al
as 1:2021cv03761
Plaintiff:
Bunzl Retail Services, LLC
Defendant:
Mid Atlantic Medical Services LLC, Peter Krieger, Alexander P Grikitis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gerber v. Gutstein, MD, Ltd. et al
as 1:2022cv05745
Plaintiff:
Robert Gerber
Defendant:
Daniel A. Gutstein, MD, Ltd., Daniel A. Gutstein and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Glen Ellyn Pharmacy, Inc. v. Women's Hormone Network, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05175
Plaintiff:
Glen Ellyn Pharmacy, Inc.
Defendant:
Women's Hormone Network, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Annamalai v. Sproul et al
as 3:2022cv01541
Plaintiff:
Annamalai Annamalai and Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Defendant:
Daniel Sproul, Nathan Simpkins, Gary Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gerber v. Maher et al
as 1:2022cv04304
Plaintiff:
Dr. Robert Gerber
Defendant:
Lachlan Joseph Maher, Podiatrist Growth Group LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
