Cases 51 - 60 of 95
Sanchez v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2012cv01726
Plaintiff:
Roberto Sanchez
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dixon v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2012cv01578
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. Dixon
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Burgess v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2012cv01468
Plaintiff:
Octavia D. Burgess
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Tyler v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2012cv01388
Plaintiff:
Marjorie G. Tyler
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Jordan et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. et al
as 1:2012cv01257
Plaintiff:
Alonzo E. Jordan and Olisa Jordan
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. , Philip Martin, Esq. , Janet Miles, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Connelly v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2012cv00741
Plaintiff:
Beth Connelly
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Stanford v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2012cv00516
Plaintiff:
Berneitha W. Stanford
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. , JP Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Corp. , Chase Home Finance, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Patel et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2012cv00458
Plaintiff:
Mukesh Patel and Sangeeta M. Patel
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Jones et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00035
Plaintiff:
Edward Jones and Teresa Jones
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. , Synovus Financial Corp. and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Counter_claimant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Counter_defendant:
Edward Jones and Teresa Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
King v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2012cv00274
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline E. King
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. , Barrett, Daffin, Frappier, Levine & Block LLP and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
