Cases 51 - 60 of 170
DIGGS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv14588
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES H DIGGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAMPTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv11794
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES H HAMPTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv04139
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES H KING JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spreitzer v. Tony et al
as 0:2019cv62920
Plaintiff:
James H Spreitzer
Defendant:
Sheriff Gregory Tony, Ms. Arencibia and Ms. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOYLE et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 1:2019cv24735
Plaintiff:
DONALD GEISLER, JOHN MCGEARY, GARY LEITER and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv02759
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
DOYLE et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 4:2019cv00500
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Plaintiff:
BILLY DOYLE, DONALD GEISLER, JOHN MCGEARY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Hernandez v. Aero Hardware & Supply, Inc. et al
as 0:2019cv62149
Defendant:
John Serra, Aero Hardware & Supply, Inc. and James H. Inglis
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv02082
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Martinez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv00948
Plaintiff:
James H. Martinez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
