Cases 51 - 60 of 132
HART v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86316
Defendant:
BECHTEL CORPORATION, IMO INDUSTRIES, JOHN CRANE and others
Plaintiff:
JACOB A. HART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HELMACY v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86317
Defendant:
MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC., EXXON MOBIL CORP., ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JOAN G. HELMACY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HINES v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86318
Defendant:
VIACOM, INC., OAKFABCO, INC., UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
E.C. HINES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOLSTEN v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86319
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC., JOHN CRANE, 3M and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIE E. HOLSTEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUDSON v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86320
Defendant:
D.B. RILEY, INC., OAKFABCO, INC., JOHN CRANE and others
Plaintiff:
MARY L. HUDSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUNT v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86321
Defendant:
BECHTEL INC. doing business as BECHTEL INC. OF NEVADA also known as C & I GIRDLER COMPANY INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BECHTEL, INC., ETC., BECHTEL CORPORATION, BURNS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HUNT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JACKSON v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86322
Defendant:
3M, UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, OAKFABCO, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
TOMMY L. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JACKSON v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86323
Defendant:
BURNS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION, MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC., GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TOMMY L. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JAMES v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86324
Defendant:
3M, AVENTIS CROPSCIENCE USA, INC., OAKFABCO, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM C. JAMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JEFFERSON v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86325
Defendant:
EXXON MOBIL CORP., VIACOM, INC., 3M and others
Plaintiff:
MARTHA J. JEFFERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
