Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 68
Sivak v. Christensen, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00514
Defendant: A DeWayne Shedd, Cynthia Martinez, Jay Christensen and others
Plaintiff: Lacey Mark Sivak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lacey Sivak v. USDC-IDB
as 20-70308
Not Classified By Court: In re: LACEY MARK SIVAK and JOHN DOE
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO, BOISE
Petitioner: LACEY MARK SIVAK
Lacey Sivak v. USDC-IDB
as 20-70310
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO, BOISE
Petitioner: LACEY MARK SIVAK
Not Classified By Court: In re: LACEY MARK SIVAK, COURT OF APPEALS, IDAHO SUPREME COURT and others
Lacey Sivak v. USDC-IDB
as 20-70255
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO, BOISE
Not Classified By Court: A. DEWAYNE SHEDD, In re: LACEY MARK SIVAK, JAY CHRISTENSEN and others
Petitioner: LACEY MARK SIVAK
Lacey Sivak v. Ada County Courts, et al
as 19-35805
Plaintiff / Appellant: LACEY MARK SIVAK
Defendant / Appellee: IDAHO SUPREME COURT, COURT OF APPEALS and ADA COUNTY COURTS
Lacey Sivak v. John Doe
as 19-35828
Plaintiff / Appellant: LACEY MARK SIVAK
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN DOE
Lacey Sivak v. John Doe
as 19-35652
Plaintiff / Appellant: LACEY MARK SIVAK
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN DOE
Lacey Sivak v. Jay Christensen We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-35713
Petitioner / Appellant: LACEY MARK SIVAK
Respondent / Appellee: JAY CHRISTENSEN
Lacey Sivak v. USDC-IDB
as 16-73384
: In re: LACEY MARK SIVAK
Petitioner: LACEY MARK SIVAK
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO, BOISE
Real Party In Interest: RANDY BLADES, Warden
Sivak v. Blades We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00189
Petitioner: Lacey Mark Sivak
Respondent: Randy Blades
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?