Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 51 - 57 of 57
HALL et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv63263
Plaintiff: WILLARD HALL and FLORETTA HALL
Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., AC&S INC., A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PAWLIK et al v. ATLAS TURNER, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv63387
Plaintiff: ANTHONY PAWLIK, JR. and STEPHANIE PAWLIK
Defendant: ATLAS TURNER, INC., ASBERIT, S.A., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MOSCA et al v. AC&S INC. et al
as 2:2007cv63289
Plaintiff: ALMONDO MOSCA and ROSE MOSCO
Defendant: AC&S INC., A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
COOK et al v. AC&S INC. et al
as 2:2007cv63288
Plaintiff: VINCENT COOK and MURIEL COOK
Defendant: AC&S INC., A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES COMPANY, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
JOSEPH v. AMERADA HESS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv63341
Plaintiff: COSMAS JOSEPH
Defendant: AMERADA HESS CORPORATION, A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES COMPANY, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DICEGLIE v. LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUEBEC et al
as 2:2007cv63129
Plaintiff: MARGARET DICEGLIE
Defendant: LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUEBEC, LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUEBEC, PORTER HAYDEN COMPANY and others
ThirdParty Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ASTEN HILL, Carolina Asbestos Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
JIMENEZ et al v. A.C. & S., INC. et al
as 2:2007cv63384
Plaintiff: CARMELO JIMENEZ and ELSA JIMENEZ
Defendant: A.C. & S., INC., A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES COMPANY, CENTRAL JERSEY SUPPLY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?