Cases 51 - 60 of 1,875
Singh v. Garland
as 24-1292
Petitioner:
PARAMJIT SINGH, BALVIR KAUR, MANPREET KAUR and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Akramov v. Garland
as 24-1251
Petitioner:
IZZATJON IKRAMOVICH AKRAMOV, MALIKA FAZLIDDINOVNA AMINOVA and MUHAMMADAMIN IZZATJONOVICH IKRAMOV
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gonzalez-Roblero v. Garland
as 24-1277
Petitioner:
BLADIMIR GONZALEZ-ROBLERO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Chicaiza-Caisaguano v. Garland
as 24-1275
Petitioner:
MYRIAN YOLANDA CHICAIZA-CAISAGUANO, DYLAN DARIO GUACHICHULLCA-CHICAIZA and CRISTIAN DANIEL GUACHICHULLCA-CHICAIZA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Roldan-Guaraca v. Garland
as 24-1244
Petitioner:
SEGUNDO OLMEDO ROLDAN-GUARACA, ANA LUCIA DAQUILEMA-PUCULPALA and THALIA ALEXANDRA ROLDAN-DAQUILEMA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Vivanco Barrientos De Allcca v. Garland
as 24-1231
Petitioner:
SONIA ERIKA VIVANCO BARRIENTOS DE ALLCCA, ABRAHAM EUGENIO ALLCCA VIVANCO and BENEDICTO EUGENIO ALLCCA VEGA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Salazar Asencio v. Garland
as 24-1230
Petitioner:
DIEGO SALAZAR ASENCIO, ERMINIA HENRIQUEZ SALAZAR, DIEGO SALAZAR HENRIQUEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hoo-Caal De Pop v. Garland
as 24-1232
Petitioner:
ELUVIA HOO-CAAL DE POP, MARITZA LETICIA POP-HOO, SIMON POB-CHUB and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Villalta Martinez v. Garland
as 24-1222
Petitioner:
JOSE SAUL VILLALTA MARTINEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Parvin v. Garland
as 24-1228
Petitioner:
TANJIM PARVIN, TAHSINUL ISLAM, TASHNIMUL ISLAM and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
