Cases 51 - 60 of 132
HUDSON v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86320
Defendant:
D.B. RILEY, INC., OAKFABCO, INC., JOHN CRANE and others
Plaintiff:
MARY L. HUDSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUNT v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86321
Defendant:
BECHTEL INC. doing business as BECHTEL INC. OF NEVADA also known as C & I GIRDLER COMPANY INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BECHTEL, INC., ETC., BECHTEL CORPORATION, BURNS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HUNT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JACKSON v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86322
Defendant:
3M, UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, OAKFABCO, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
TOMMY L. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JACKSON v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86323
Defendant:
BURNS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION, MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC., GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TOMMY L. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JAMES v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86324
Defendant:
3M, AVENTIS CROPSCIENCE USA, INC., OAKFABCO, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM C. JAMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JEFFERSON v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86325
Defendant:
EXXON MOBIL CORP., VIACOM, INC., 3M and others
Plaintiff:
MARTHA J. JEFFERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86326
Defendant:
BECHTEL CORPORATION, CRANE COMPANY, 3M and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK L. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86327
Defendant:
GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC., AVENTIS CROPSCIENCE USA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
PEGGY JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86328
Defendant:
OAKFABCO, INC., GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY D. JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86329
Defendant:
OAKFABCO, INC., UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
