Cases 51 - 60 of 155
THOMPSON v. BASHAM et al
as 1:2008cv00877
Plaintiff:
LESLIE STEPHEN THOMPSON
Defendant:
W. RALPH BASHAM, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, MICHAEL CHERTOFF and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
TEXAS BORDER COALITION v. CHERTOFF et al
as 1:2008cv00848
Plaintiff:
TEXAS BORDER COALITION
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF and ROBERT F. JANSON
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
AL-TAMIMI v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2008cv00843
Plaintiff:
RIDHA HUSSAIN AL-TAMIMI and RIDHA HUSSAIN AL-TAMIMI
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BRYL v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2008cv00811
Plaintiff:
GREGORY N. BRYL
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
AL-AHMED v. CHERTOFF et al
as 1:2008cv00678
Plaintiff:
ALI AL-AHMED
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, PHYLLIS HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MILLATMAL v. CHERTOFF et al
as 1:2008cv00592
Plaintiff:
TAJUDDIN MILLATMAL
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALES, BRET S. GREGG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
HEFETZ v. GONZALEZ et al
as 1:2008cv00610
Plaintiff:
YOSEF HEFETZ
Defendant:
EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, ROBERT S. MUELLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
JEE v. CHERTOFF et al
as 1:2008cv00552
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMAD A. GULL JEE
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, ROBERT S. MUELLER, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
KANANI v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2008cv00532
Plaintiff:
MASSOUD KANANI
Defendant:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
