Cases 51 - 60 of 75
MORIN et al v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CO et al
as 2:2007cv63930
Plaintiff:
GEORGE J. MORIN, SR and GERMAINE MORIN
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CO, RAPID AMERICA CORP, RAPID AMERICA CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SMITH et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS et al
as 2:2007cv63955
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN C SMITH and MARY LOU SMITH
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS, PITTSBURGH CORNING CO, RAPID AMERICAN CORP and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS
ThirdParty Defendant:
EASTERN REFRACTORIES, MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
CASEY et al v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CO et al
as 2:2007cv63852
Plaintiff:
HAROLD C. CASEY and LORRAINE CASEY
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CO, AC&S INC., AC&S INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
GARLOCK INC, W R GRACE & COMPANY, W R GRACE & COMPANY and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and EASTERN REFRACTORIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MICHAUD et al v. EASTERN REFRACTORIES CO. INC. et al
as 2:2007cv63909
Plaintiff:
PHILIP MICHAUD and JOYCE MICHAUD
Defendant:
EASTERN REFRACTORIES CO. INC., EAGLE PICHER INDUSTRIES INC., OWENS CORNING FIBREGLAS and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
PITTSBURGH -CORNING CORPORATION
ThirdParty Defendant:
GARLOCK INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WRIGHT v. EASTERN REFRACTORIES et al
as 2:2007cv63914
Plaintiff:
LINWOOD WRIGHT
Defendant:
EASTERN REFRACTORIES, FIBREBOARD CORPORATION, GAF CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
GARLOCK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WASHBURN v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CO et al
as 2:2007cv63848
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK WASHBURN
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CO, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, FIBREBOARD CORP. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO, OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., U.S. GYPSUM COMPANY and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
EASTERN REFRACTORIES, GARLOCK INC and MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BOULETTE et al v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv63846
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. BOULETTE and NANCY BOULETTE
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION, KEENE CORPORATION, OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
KEENE CORPORATION, OWENS ILLINOIS GLASS, INC and OWENS ILLINOIS INC
ThirdParty Defendant:
EASTERN REFRACTORIES and GARLOCK INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
THIBEAU et al v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CO. et al
as 2:2007cv63854
Plaintiff:
SIMON THIBEAU and MARIE THIBEAU
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CO., AC&S, INC., FIBREBOARD CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
GARLOCK, INC., FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION and AC&S, INC.
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORP. ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, EASTERN REFRACTORIES CO., INC. and EASTERN REFRACTORIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DERAPS et al v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CO. et al
as 2:2007cv63925
Plaintiff:
SIDNEY DERAPS and CAROL DERAPS
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CO., ACANDS, INC., ACANDS, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES , INC., FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, EASTERN REFRACTORIES and EASTERN REFRACTORIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
GAUTHIER v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CO. et al
as 2:2007cv63926
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND C. GAUTHIER
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CO., KEENE CORP., ACANDS, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
GARLOCK INC., ACANDS INC., ACANDS INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and EASTERN REFRACTORIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
