Cases 51 - 60 of 75
ROBINSON v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv63923
Plaintiff:
VENA A. ROBINSON and VENA A. ROBINSON
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., CHICAGO BRIDGE AND IRON, EMPIRE ACE INSULATION CO. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
OWENS ILLINOIS, INC., OWENS ILLINOIS, INC., OWENS ILLINOIS, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
EASTERN REFRACTORIES, MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HERSOM v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CO et al
as 2:2007cv63872
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH HERSOM
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CO, AC & S INC., AC & S INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
AC & S INC., AC & S INC., AC & S INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
EASTERN REFRACTORIES, MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
COTE et al v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CO et al
as 2:2007cv63873
Plaintiff:
PAUL E. COTE and MARGARET COTE
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CO, RAPID AMERICAN CORP, RAPID AMERICAN CORP and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
AC&S INC., AC&S INC., AC&S INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
EASTERN REFRACTORIES, MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, EASTERN REFRACTORIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
COFFRON v. OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS et al
as 2:2007cv63951
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY COFFRON
Defendant:
OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS, PITTSBURGH CORNING CO, RAPID AMERICAN CORP and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS
ThirdParty Defendant:
EASTERN REFRACTORIES, MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ROUSSEAU et al v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CO et al
as 2:2007cv63942
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E ROUSSEAU and LEDA L ROUSSEAU
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CO, RAPID AMERICAN CORP, AC&S INC and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
EASTERN REFRACTORIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LEE et al v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CO et al
as 2:2007cv63950
Plaintiff:
RICHARD H LEE and JEANETTE LEE
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CO, RAPID AMERICAN CORP, AC&S INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PENDLETON v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CO et al
as 2:2007cv63865
Plaintiff:
GEORGE E. PENDLETON
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CO, AC&S INC, AC&S INC and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
EASTERN REFRACTORIES and MANVILLE ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HUGHES et al v. CROWN CORK AND SEAL COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv63935
Plaintiff:
RAY J. HUGHES, RAY J. HUGHES, RAY J. HUGHES and others
Defendant:
CROWN CORK AND SEAL COMPANY, OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS, PITTSBURGH CORNING CO and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
W R GRACE AND CO CONN, W R GRACE AND CO CONN, W R GRACE AND CO CONN and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
EASTERN REFRACTORIES and GARLOCK INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PARDUE et al v. EASTERN REFRACTORIES et al
as 2:2007cv63953
Plaintiff:
RONALD A PARDUE, SR and DIANE PARDUE
Defendant:
EASTERN REFRACTORIES, GARLOCK INC, OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS
ThirdParty Defendant:
EASTERN REFRACTORIES, MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SABOL v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CO et al
as 2:2007cv63874
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH P SABOL, JR
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CO, RAPID AMERICAN CORP, RAPID AMERICAN CORP and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
AC&S INC., AC&S INC., AC&S INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
EASTERN REFRACTORIES, MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, EASTERN REFRACTORIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
