Cases 51 - 60 of 1,378
EDGERLY v. GAF CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv83631
Plaintiff:
LOUIS EDGERLY
Defendant:
GAF CORP., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , KEENE BUILDING PRODUCTS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GIBSON v. GAF CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv83721
Plaintiff:
KENNETH V. GIBSON
Defendant:
GAF CORP., JOHNS MANVILLE CORP., JOHNS MANVILLE PRODUCTS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
GIBSON v. GAF CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv83722
Plaintiff:
KENNETH V. GIBSON
Defendant:
GAF CORP., JOHNS MANVILLE CORP., JOHNS MANVILLE PRODUCTS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
COLANGELI v. GAF CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv83340
Plaintiff:
GEORGE COLANGELI
Defendant:
GAF CORP., JOHNS MANVILLE CORP., JOHNS MANVILLE PRODUCTS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POOLE v. GAF CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv83338
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD POOLE
Defendant:
GAF CORP., JOHNS MANVILLE CORP., JOHNS MANVILLE PRODUCTS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COLOMBO v. GAF CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv83341
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. COLOMBO
Defendant:
GAF CORP., JOHNS MANVILLE CORP., JOHNS MANVILLE PRODUCTS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JACOBSEN v. GAF CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv83331
Plaintiff:
JON JACOBSEN
Defendant:
GAF CORP., JOHNS MANVILLE CORP., JOHNS MANVILLE PRODUCTS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MATTSON v. GAF CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv83402
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MATTSON
Defendant:
GAF CORP., FORTY-EIGHT INSULATION, INC., RAYBESTOS MANHATTAN, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAGLIONE v. GAF CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv83339
Plaintiff:
ROCCO A. MAGLIONE
Defendant:
GAF CORP., JOHNS MANVILLE CORP., JOHNS MANVILLE PRODUCTS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOLMES v. GAF CORP., ET AL
as 2:2010cv83720
Plaintiff:
BARTIMUS HOLMES
Defendant:
GAF CORP., JOHNS MANVILLE CORP., UNION ASBESTOS & RUBBER CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
