Cases 51 - 60 of 210
LHF Productions, Inc. v. Doe-50.39.179.144
as 3:2017cv00154
Defendant:
Doe-50.39.179.144
Plaintiff:
LHF Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe-71.237.177.90
as 3:2017cv00156
Plaintiff:
Criminal Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Doe-71.237.177.90
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe-67.171.170.14
as 3:2016cv02094
Plaintiff:
Criminal Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Doe-67.171.170.14
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
TYR Wood Products, Inc. v. Penman et al
as 3:2016cv01909
Defendant:
Medeina Lumber LLC and Christopher G. Penman
Plaintiff:
TYR Wood Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
LHF Productions, Inc. v. Doe-73.180.35.80
as 3:2016cv01747
Defendant:
Doe-73.180.35.80
Plaintiff:
LHF Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
September Productions, Inc. v. Doe-73.240.174.9
as 3:2016cv01746
Movant:
Mike Damyan
Defendant:
Doe-73.240.174.9
Plaintiff:
September Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
ME2 Productions, Inc. v. Doe-76.27.219.56
as 3:2016cv01724
Defendant:
Doe-76.27.219.56
Plaintiff:
ME2 Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
ME2 Productions, Inc. v. Doe-73.164.239.74
as 3:2016cv01725
Movant:
Cambria Core
Defendant:
Doe-73.164.239.74
Plaintiff:
ME2 Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe-50.53.142.234
as 3:2016cv01695
Plaintiff:
Criminal Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Doe-50.53.142.234
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
