Cases 51 - 60 of 64
GRAYSON COUNTY, VIRGINIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv00718
Plaintiff:
GRAYSON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
MERCED COUNTY, CALIFORNIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv00354
Plaintiff:
MERCED COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR. and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
CITY OF PINSON, ALABAMA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv00255
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PINSON, ALABAMA
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR. and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY, VIRGINIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv00014
Plaintiff:
PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
KING GEORGE COUNTY, VIRGINIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2011cv02164
Plaintiff:
KING GEORGE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
CULPEPER COUNTY, VIRGINIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2011cv01477
Plaintiff:
CULPEPER COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
RODRIGUEZ et al v. SHULMAN et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2011cv01183
Plaintiff:
IRENE D. RODRIGUEZ and ISIDORO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
DOUGLAS SHULMAN, WILLIAM J. WILKINS, DEBORAH A. BUTLER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
RAPPAHANNOCK COUNTY, VIRGINIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2011cv01123
Plaintiff:
RAPPAHANNOCK COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
ALTA IRRIGATION DISTRICT v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2011cv00758
Plaintiff:
ALTA IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
CITY OF MANASSAS PARK, VIRGINIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2011cv00749
Plaintiff:
CITY OF MANASSAS PARK, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.