Cases 51 - 60 of 90
Local 743 International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Rush University Medical Center
as 1:2015cv02457
Plaintiff:
Local 743 International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Defendant:
Rush University Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Nehra v. Rush Medical College
as 1:2014cv07445
Plaintiff:
Ajay Nehra
Defendant:
Rush Medical College , Rush University , Rush University Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv05537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv07646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv06778
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
McDaniel v. Loyola University Medical Center et al
as 1:2013cv06500
Plaintiff:
Mark D McDaniel
Defendant:
Loyola University Medical Center , Trinity Health Corporation, Loyola University Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rush University Medical Center v. Sebelius
as 1:2013cv03217
Plaintiff:
Rush University Medical Center
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Gomaa v. Loyola University Medical Center
as 1:2012cv08960
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Gomaa
Defendant:
Loyola University Medical Center
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Gomaa v. Loyola University Medical Center
as 1:2012cv08962
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Gomaa
Defendant:
Loyola University Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ziemba v. Computer Credit, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv07939
Plaintiff:
Rose Ziemba
Defendant:
Computer Credit, Inc. and Rush University Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
