Cases 51 - 60 of 126
Morris v. James T. Vaughn Correctional Center
as 1:2018cv00252
Plaintiff:
Tyrone J. Morris
Defendant:
James T. Vaughn Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Restrepo v. Phelps et al
as 1:2018cv00228
Plaintiff:
Juan Restrepo
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Dana Metzger, Delaware Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Feinstein v. Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01864
Plaintiff:
Robert Feinstein
Defendant:
Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc., Jack E. Vaughn, Paul Keglevic and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Biggins v. Denn et al
as 1:2017cv01537
Petitioner:
James Arthur Biggins
Respondent:
Matt Denn, Perry Phelps, Delaware Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Andrus v. James T. Vaughn Correctional Center
as 1:2017cv01492
Plaintiff:
Daryl Andrus
Defendant:
James T. Vaughn Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. State Of Delaware et al
as 1:2017cv01230
Petitioner:
Parris Hamilton
Respondent:
State Of Delaware, James T. Vaughn Correctional Center and Matt Denn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Eyster v. James T. Vaughn Correctional Center et al
as 1:2017cv00670
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eyster
Defendant:
James T. Vaughn Correctional Center, Warden and James T. Vaughn Correctional Center Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Skinner v. James T. Vaughn Correctional Center et al
as 1:2017cv00589
Plaintiff:
Edward L. Skinner
Defendant:
James T. Vaughn Correctional Center and Connections Community Services Program
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schwartz v. Lumos Networks Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv00415
Plaintiff:
Jacob Schwartz
Defendant:
Lumos Networks Corp., Robert E. Guth, Timothy G. Blitz and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Parshall v. Lumos Networks Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv00369
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Defendant:
Lumos Networks Corp., Lawrence J. Askowitz, Timothy G. Biltz and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
