Cases 51 - 60 of 139
Carr v. Christensen, et al.
as 1:2022cv00396
Plaintiff:
Jody Carr
Defendant:
Warden Jay Christensen, Deputy Warden Timothy McKay, Sergeant Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ericsson v. Anderson, et al.
as 3:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
Gunnar Bjorn Ericsson
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Amy B Anderson and Warden Terema D Carlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Warden Davis
as 1:2022cv00378
Petitioner:
John Lee
Respondent:
Warden Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shunn v. IDOC, et al.
as 1:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
Forrest Glenn Shunn
Defendant:
IDOC, Warden Wesseler and Sgt. Smyth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDaniel v. Davis, et al.
as 1:2022cv00240
Plaintiff:
Robert P. McDaniel
Defendant:
Warden Ty Davis, NP Selah Worley, Corizon Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoffman v. Rule
as 4:2022cv00290
Petitioner:
Monte Hoffman
Respondent:
Warden Rule
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hoffman v. Rule
as 1:2022cv00278
Petitioner:
Monte G Hoffman
Respondent:
Warden Rule
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Shunn v. IDOC, et al.
as 1:2022cv00238
Plaintiff:
Forrest Glenn Shunn
Defendant:
IDOC, ISCI and Warden Wesseler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hassan v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2022cv00219
Petitioner:
Mohammed Hassan
Respondent:
State of Idaho and Warden John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crutcher v. State of Idaho, et al.
as 1:2022cv00223
Petitioner:
Gwenda Lynn Crutcher
Respondent:
State of Idaho and Warden Woodland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
