Cases 51 - 60 of 3,641
Anderson v. Dowell, et al.
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Devon Joseph Anderson
Defendant:
Ashley Dowell, Shane Saxton, Conley Hyde and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matuguina v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Brian John Matuguina
Respondent:
Warden Tyrell Davis, Boise Police, Ada Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BBlock v. Linze et al
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
William BBlock
Defendant:
Linze, Copeland, Renfro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sivak v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
SGT. Ramirez, Aaron Fodge, R. Findeisen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matuguina v. City of Boise, et al.
as 1:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Brian John Matuguina
Defendant:
City of Boise, Boise Police Department, Kip Paporello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Creech v. Idaho Commission of Pardons and Parole, et al.
as 1:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Thomas Eugene Creech
Defendant:
Idaho Commission of Pardons and Parole and Jan M. Bennetts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MacNeil v. Harris et al
as 1:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Dudley MacNeil
Defendant:
Judge Harris, Judge Butler, Twin Falls County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wintrode v. Clive et al
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Joshwa Aaron Wintrode
Defendant:
Dr. Clive, Dr. Dayley, Dr. Mcghinnis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00044
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ramirez v. USA
as 1:2024cv00034
Petitioner:
Alexa Ramirez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
