Cases 61 - 63 of 63
In re Commercial Money Center, Inc., Equipment Lease Litigation
as 1:2002cv16000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff(s) in Commercial Money Center Litigation , Citibank, N.A. , JPMorgan Chase Bank and others
Defendant:
Commercial Money Center, Inc. , Royal Indemnity Company , RLI Insurance Company and others
Interested_party:
Footbridge Limited Trust , Atlantic Coast Federal and FirstMerit Bank, N.A.
Movant:
Guardian VI, LLC , Guardian Shield Holdings, Ltd. , Guardian Advisor Corp. and others
3rd_party_plaintiff:
Ace INA Holdings, Inc. and Rafferty Capital Markets
3rd_pty_defendant:
A&M Select Insurance Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
State of Ohio, ex rel., Betty D. Montgomery et al v. Chemical Land Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2002cv00193
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio, ex rel., Betty D. Montgomery
Defendant:
Chemical Land Holdings, Inc., Maxus Energy Corporation, Crompton Manufacturing Company, Inc., and others
Cross Defendant:
Occidental Chemcial Corporation, Painsville Township Board of Trustees, Village of Fairport Harbor and others
Cross Claimant:
Scepter Management Corporation, Inc. and Painesville PRP Group
Counter Defendant:
Tiera Solutions, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Philip Metals Recovery (USA) Inc. and Aluminum Smelting & Refining Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Resource & Recovery Act
Maxus Energy Corporation et al v. Ace Lakefront Properties, Inc. et al
as 1:2000cv00972
Cross Defendant:
Maxus Energy Corporation, Chemical Land Holdings, Environmental Brine Services, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Ace Lakefront Properties, Inc., Dartron Corporation, Eltech Systems Corporation and others
Counter Defendant:
Cousins, Inc. and Scepter Management Corporation
3Rd Party Defendant:
Aluminum Smelting & Refining Company, Inc. and Occidental Chemcial Corporation
Cross Claimant:
Philip Metal Recovery (USA) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
