Cases 61 - 70 of 621
Whitfield v. Radius Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00973
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitefield and Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Radius Health, Inc., Willard H. Dere, Catherine Friedman and others
Waterman v. Radius Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00975
Plaintiff:
Marc Waterman
Defendant:
Radius Health, Inc., Willard H. Dere, Catherine Friedman and others
Johnson v. Natus Medical Incorporated et al
as 1:2022cv00795
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
Natus Medical Incorporated, Joshua H. Levine, Thomas J. Sullivan and others
Wilhelm v. Vidler Water Resources, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00631
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilhelm
Defendant:
Vidler Water Resources, Inc., Maxim C.W. Webb, Dorothy Timian-Palmer and others
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. et al v. Sandoz Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00591
Plaintiff:
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and H. Lundbeck A/S
Defendant:
Sandoz Inc. and Sandoz International GmbH
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. et al v. Mylan Laboratories Limited et al
as 1:2022cv00464
Plaintiff:
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and H. Lundbeck A/S
Defendant:
Mylan Laboratories Limited, Viatris Inc. and Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Osman v. Bor et al
as 1:2022cv00431
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Osman
Defendant:
Michael W. Bor, Thomas W. Stoltz, Rebecca Polak and others
Nominal Defendant:
CarLotz, Inc.
Petitioner:
W. Kenmore Cardoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Crenshaw v. Spirit Airlines, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00358
Plaintiff:
Rolando Crenshaw
Defendant:
Spirit Airlines, Inc., Edward M. Christie, H. McIntyre Gardner and others
Muircroft v. Resonant Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
Gregory Muircroft
Defendant:
Resonant Inc., George B. Holmes, Michael Fox and others
Finger v. Lawson Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
Katherine Finger
Defendant:
Lawson Products, Inc., Michael G. Decata, Andrew H. Albert, I and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
