Cases 61 - 70 of 78
DANDRIDGE v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60111
Plaintiff:
JOHN M. DANDRIDGE
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAUER v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60051
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BAUER
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PETRUSH v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60117
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PETRUSH
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YATES v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60122
Plaintiff:
DAVID YATES
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUFF v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60080
Plaintiff:
THEODORE DUFF
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60106
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WILLIAMS
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60084
Plaintiff:
DONN D. JOHNSON
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROADWAY v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60079
Plaintiff:
ROOSEVELT BROADWAY
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHROEDER v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60104
Plaintiff:
HANS SCHROEDER
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAWKINS v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60098
Plaintiff:
LEROY HAWKINS
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
