Cases 61 - 70 of 153
Woods v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv01352
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jeanette M. Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McMillian v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv01337
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Darlene McMillian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fagan v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv01361
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Charles Fagan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mcelheney v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv01351
Plaintiff:
Edward Mcelheney
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv01338
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kevin Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carter v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv01359
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robin Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis-Rivers et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv01339
Plaintiff:
Dianca Lewis-Rivers and Joseph Lee-Rivers
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCrory v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv01347
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jennifer McCrory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GINES v. C R BARD INCORPORATED et al
as 7:2020cv00051
Defendant:
C R BARD INCORPORATED and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
ANGEL GINES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ross v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv01343
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
