Cases 61 - 70 of 20,262
Wible v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03652
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Billie Wible
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cocke et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv03645
Plaintiff:
Douglas Cocke and Holly Cocke
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hughes v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03647
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Heroux et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03650
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Heroux and Maria Heroux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stancil v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03651
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Terrence Stancil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Edgington v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03619
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robin Edgington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ferrantelli v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ferrantelli
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Phillips v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03618
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
William Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wagenfuehr v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03622
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Craig Wagenfuehr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gilcrease v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03626
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Darlene Gilcrease
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
