Cases 61 - 70 of 119
CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Eleets Logistics, Inc.
as 3:2012cv01260
Plaintiff:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Defendant:
Eleets Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11702 (a)(4) Violations of Interstate Commerce Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv02454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Blakeslee et al
as 3:2012cv00713
Plaintiff:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Defendant:
Jason E. Blakeslee , Jennifer A. Blakeslee and Blakeslee Premium Pellets
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00675
Plaintiff:
Brian O. Johnson
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc., National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak), Keith A. Drewes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
CSX Transportation, Inc. v. First United Ethanol, LLC
as 3:2011cv00804
Plaintiff:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Defendant:
First United Ethanol, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schummrick v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) et al
as 0:2011cv61449
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) , CSX Transportation, Inc. and John F Considine
Plaintiff:
Sorphea Schummrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Doyle v. CSX Transportation
as 3:2010cv00532
Plaintiff:
Sean Doyle
Defendant:
CSX Transportation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
